Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UMBC

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for UMBC, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Marcus Banks77.0%-1.2range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryce Johnson76.0%+0.1range -1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.7 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josh Odunowo68.0%-0.2range -1.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.3 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ace Valentine63.3%-0.2range -1.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Marlon Short57.9%-0.7range -2.0 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Louie Jordan54.5%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Devan Sapp29.1%-1.0range -2.0 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Regimantas Ciunys26.9%+0.1range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
JC Harris16.0%-0.1range -1.1 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daylon Dickerson10.9%-0.1range -1.2 to +0.8Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ashton Reese6.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Tim Eze5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chaydon Stone4.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Alpha Chibambe1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Torin Bosch1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Varghese0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,548,811Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,548,811Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days10
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games7

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology