Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Louisiana

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Louisiana, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Kentrell Garnett84.8%-1.6range -2.6 to -0.0Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.1 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mostapha El Moutaouakkil67.1%-0.6range -1.9 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Christian Wright62.2%-0.8range -1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kyran Ratliff50.2%-0.4range -1.3 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.6 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael Thomas47.8%-2.5range -3.7 to -1.1Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kyndall Davis42.5%-1.1range -2.2 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brandon Hardy38.9%-1.3range -2.8 to -0.4Sufficient evidence+1.3range +0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zeke Cook33.9%-0.7range -1.5 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
London Fields27.9%-2.7range -3.8 to -1.7Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.5 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jeremiah Evans19.9%-0.6range -1.8 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chancellor White19.8%-1.3range -2.3 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Koron Davis4.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Christian Landry0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

25 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (78%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 7 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$3,342,908Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$3,342,908Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days8
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology