UC Irvine
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Hohn | 71.0% | +1.5range +0.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +4.0range +3.2 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Devin Tillis | 70.6% | +4.3range +2.9 to +5.5Sufficient evidence | +5.4range +4.6 to +6.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Myles Che | 68.5% | +2.0range +0.7 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | +4.1range +3.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Bent Leuchten | 65.9% | +5.7range +4.0 to +7.0Sufficient evidence | +5.6range +4.9 to +6.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jurian Dixon | 63.8% | +1.6range +0.5 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Torian Lee | 37.4% | +0.7range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | +1.8range +1.6 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kyle Evans | 30.4% | +1.5range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ofure Ujadughele | 28.0% | +0.7range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Berk Can Akin | 21.7% | -0.0range -1.4 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ben Egbo | 14.0% | -1.3range -2.0 to -0.4Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Andre Henry | 12.9% | +1.8range +1.1 to +2.7Limited evidence | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Langston Redfield | 8.1% | +0.7range -0.2 to +1.8Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Elijah Chol | 6.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tishan Ahir | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
28 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (85%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 5 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $4,248,011 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $4,248,011 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 3 |
| 2 days | 11 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 3 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 5 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology