Tulane
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rowan Brumbaugh | 87.2% | +1.8range +0.9 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | +5.3range +4.7 to +6.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kam Williams | 82.8% | +1.3range +0.2 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | +4.8range +4.2 to +5.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kaleb Banks | 76.1% | +0.4range -1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +3.9range +3.2 to +4.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Asher Woods | 74.8% | +2.3range +1.7 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | +4.8range +4.4 to +5.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Gregg Glenn III | 67.2% | +2.0range +0.8 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +4.2range +3.6 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Mari Jordan | 45.0% | -0.3range -1.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Percy Daniels | 25.4% | -0.5range -1.9 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyler Ringgold | 19.8% | -1.9range -3.1 to -0.8Sufficient evidence | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| KJ Greene | 10.6% | -0.3range -1.0 to +0.5Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Spencer Elliott | 4.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Michael Eley | 4.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Logan Stephens | 1.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Joseph Teich | 0.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jake Shapiro | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Stefan Cicic | 0.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
28 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 3 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $3,874,944 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $5,621,840 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched through an NCES IPEDS institution alias, with state and home-venue city agreeing.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 3 or more days | 28 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology