Texas A&M
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhuric Phelps | 67.5% | +0.4range -1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.0 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Wade Taylor IV | 67.1% | +3.3range +2.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | +5.2range +4.5 to +5.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Andersson Garcia | 61.2% | +4.4range +2.7 to +6.1Sufficient evidence | +5.2range +4.4 to +6.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Henry Coleman III | 53.9% | +2.3range +1.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Solomon Washington | 53.5% | +3.2range +1.9 to +4.8Sufficient evidence | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Pharrel Payne | 49.8% | +3.0range +1.6 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Manny Obaseki | 41.1% | +2.0range +0.7 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jace Carter | 40.3% | -2.6range -3.8 to -1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Hayden Hefner | 35.9% | +2.1range +0.7 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| C.J. Wilcher | 24.9% | +1.9range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | +1.7range +1.5 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Chris McDermott | 2.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaelyn Lee | 1.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Rob Dockery | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
30 of 34 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 4 of 34 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $15,734,652 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $14,312,941 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 31 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology