TAM C. Christi
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garry Clark | 77.2% | +2.7range +1.5 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | +4.7range +4.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Owen Dease | 66.4% | +1.2range +0.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | +3.4range +2.9 to +4.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaden Walker | 47.9% | +1.0range +0.1 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Isaac Williams | 42.3% | +0.9range +0.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Stephen Giwa | 40.9% | +0.4range -0.4 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Damarion Dennis | 40.1% | +1.5range -0.0 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.7 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dian Wright-Forde | 38.3% | -0.4range -1.1 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kam Parker | 36.8% | +0.2range -0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.4 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jordan Roberts | 34.6% | -0.2range -1.5 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Leo Torbor | 27.7% | -0.2range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Sheldon Williams | 18.4% | -0.5range -1.0 to -0.1Limited evidence | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Shilo Jackson | 16.2% | -0.7range -1.6 to +0.1Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Aaron Potter | 10.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Christian Villegas | 3.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
21 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (70%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 9 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,195,184 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,195,184 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 12 |
| 3 or more days | 16 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology