Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Stetson

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Stetson, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Mehki Ellison71.5%-3.5range -4.9 to -1.9Sufficient evidence+1.2range +0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Wood66.3%-1.7range -2.8 to -0.7Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josh Massey62.7%-1.5range -2.4 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jamie Phillips Jr.58.9%-1.9range -3.2 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Abramo Canka53.8%-1.8range -3.2 to -0.4Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tristan Gross48.3%-2.6range -3.5 to -1.3Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Treyton Thompson36.3%-0.5range -1.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Blaize Sagna33.6%-2.2range -3.5 to -1.2Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Finley Sheridan26.8%-0.3range -1.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daniel Macgregor13.7%-3.5range -4.3 to -2.7Limited evidence+0.2range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Alex Doyle13.4%-2.0range -2.9 to -1.1Limited evidence+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Stefano Alesso10.1%-3.9range -4.5 to -3.2Limited evidence+0.2range +0.1 to +0.2Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Landen Babusiak4.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

22 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (73%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 8 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,225,101Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,225,101Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days8
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology