Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

St John's

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for St John's, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Zuby Ejiofor81.9%+4.8range +4.0 to +5.7Sufficient evidence+6.8range +6.2 to +7.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kadary Richmond81.1%+5.7range +4.5 to +6.7Sufficient evidence+7.3range +6.5 to +8.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
RJ Luis Jr.78.8%+3.1range +2.1 to +4.0Sufficient evidence+5.5range +4.9 to +6.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aaron Scott69.3%+3.7range +3.0 to +4.5Sufficient evidence+5.1range +4.5 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Deivon Smith63.2%+2.1range +0.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.3 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Simeon Wilcher55.5%+0.3range -0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.2 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sadiku Ibine Ayo25.0%+1.6range +0.7 to +2.5Limited evidence+1.3range +1.2 to +1.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rubén Prey15.5%+1.5range +0.7 to +2.3Limited evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +0.9Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Vincent Iwuchukwu14.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Lefteris Liotopoulos12.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Brady Dunlap3.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

14 of 36 games passed lineup acceptance (39%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 22 of 36 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$31,994,396Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$31,994,396Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days2
3 or more days30

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology