Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

SMU

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for SMU, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
B.J. Edwards73.0%+2.3range +1.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+4.7range +4.1 to +5.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Matt Cross70.4%+3.2range +1.8 to +4.5Sufficient evidence+5.0range +4.2 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chuck Harris66.0%+2.7range +1.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.7 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Boopie Miller64.7%+2.3range +1.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.5 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kario Oquendo57.4%+1.6range +0.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.9 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Samet Yigitoglu57.0%+1.5range +0.4 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Yohan Traore38.4%-1.2range -2.3 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keon Ambrose-Hylton29.7%+1.1range -0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jerrell Colbert18.9%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tibet Gorener14.8%-0.9range -1.7 to -0.3Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
AJ George9.2%+0.4range -0.1 to +1.0Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Young0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Trey Utter0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (85%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$16,735,281Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$16,735,281Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
3 or more days30

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology