Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Seton Hall

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Seton Hall, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Isaiah Coleman80.9%-1.0range -2.2 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.9 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Garwey Dual59.4%-1.2range -2.3 to +0.0Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Prince Aligbe58.2%-0.3range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.6 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dylan Addae-Wusu56.6%+0.2range -1.4 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Scotty Middleton45.8%-0.5range -1.3 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chaunce Jenkins36.5%-0.1range -1.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Yacine Toumi36.4%-1.2range -2.4 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Godswill Erheriene35.2%-1.2range -2.5 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jahseem Felton33.4%-2.2range -3.8 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emmanuel Okorafor21.6%-0.5range -1.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Tubek18.7%-0.1range -1.1 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Gus Yalden16.1%-1.6range -2.9 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zion Harmon0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
David Gabriel0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$9,788,925Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$9,788,925Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days29

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology