SE Louisiana
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Hines, Jr. | 84.8% | +1.0range -0.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +4.7range +4.0 to +5.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jakevion Buckley | 75.4% | -0.3range -1.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brody Rowbury | 71.1% | +0.0range -0.9 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +2.9 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jeremy Elyzee | 70.4% | +0.3range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +3.6range +3.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Carlos Paez | 42.2% | +1.1range +0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kam Burton | 39.6% | -1.4range -2.5 to -0.4Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaiden Lawrence | 32.8% | -1.4range -2.4 to -0.4Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kyle Edison | 24.6% | -0.8range -1.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ahmed Essahaty | 18.4% | -0.7range -1.5 to +0.1Limited evidence | +0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Thomas Tut | 18.0% | -1.9range -2.6 to -1.3Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| C.J. Booker | 9.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Asher Boney | 6.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ryan Elzy | 3.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Max Brackmann | 2.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
20 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (67%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 10 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,181,300 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,181,300 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 10 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 5 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology