Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Santa Clara

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Santa Clara, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Adama Bal71.9%+1.9range +0.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.4 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Carlos Stewart70.1%+0.6range -0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.6 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tyeree Bryan59.6%+2.1range +0.7 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Johnny O'Neil56.5%+1.8range +0.6 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Mahi55.8%+3.0range +1.7 to +4.5Sufficient evidence+3.5range +3.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Christoph Tilly49.8%+2.6range +1.3 to +4.2Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.4 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jake Ensminger45.5%+2.5range +1.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.3 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Camaron Tongue36.4%+2.4range +1.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brenton Knapper34.6%+3.7range +2.5 to +5.2Sufficient evidence+2.2range +2.0 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kosy Akametu9.4%-2.4range -3.6 to -1.3Limited evidence+0.3range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bukky Oboye8.9%-0.0range -0.7 to +0.6Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brendan Yarusso0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Luke McEldon0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Malachi Douyon0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$5,977,436Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$5,977,436Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days6
3 or more days24

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology