Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

UC Santa Barbara

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for UC Santa Barbara, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jason Fontenet II77.9%-0.1range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+3.6range +2.9 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Stephan Swenson76.7%+2.0range +0.9 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.9 to +5.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cole Anderson76.6%+0.7range -0.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.3 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kenny Pohto67.3%+1.8range +0.9 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.4 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Deuce Turner47.5%-2.6range -4.0 to -1.3Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Max Murrell47.2%-1.2range -2.3 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colin Smith36.5%+0.6range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.5 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Shtolzberg27.6%+1.7range +0.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Koat Keat Tong11.3%+0.5range -0.4 to +1.2Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ariel Bland10.6%-0.6range -1.2 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Evans Kipruto9.9%-0.6range -1.1 to -0.0Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zion Sensley7.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chris Mitchell1.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
David Pickles0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Henry Hartwell0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Max Sheldon0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Elia Bongiorno0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

22 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (69%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 10 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$4,583,984Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$4,583,984Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days9
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology