Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

San Diego

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for San Diego, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Santiago Trouet63.4%-0.4range -1.4 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Steven Jamerson II56.6%+0.2range -0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tony Duckett54.2%-1.1range -2.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kody Clouet51.9%-1.5range -2.4 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Deven Dahlke49.8%-1.5range -2.7 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kjay Bradley Jr.44.8%+0.3range -0.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bendji Pierre42.7%-2.8range -3.9 to -1.6Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Joey Chammaa34.0%-3.3range -4.9 to -1.5Sufficient evidence+0.7range +0.4 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kean Webb24.4%-1.1range -2.0 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Simon20.0%-1.8range -2.9 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colby Brooks12.4%-0.6range -1.7 to +0.6Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dragos Lungu8.7%-0.8range -1.2 to -0.4Limited evidence+0.3range +0.3 to +0.4Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dominic Muncey8.6%-2.5range -3.2 to -1.7Limited evidence+0.2range +0.2 to +0.3Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keyon Kensie Jr.7.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Neel Beniwal6.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Gavin Ripp6.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Gaffney5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chas Lewless1.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Nick Del Bosque0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (81%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 6 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$5,328,384Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$5,328,384Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days10
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology