Sam Houston St
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Wilkerson | 87.7% | +0.3range -0.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.3 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cameron Huefner | 76.1% | +0.5range -0.6 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +3.4range +2.9 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kalifa Sakho | 65.5% | +0.9range -0.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.8 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Marcus Boykin | 60.9% | +1.9range +0.5 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | +3.3range +2.8 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Josiah Hammons | 52.4% | -0.6range -1.7 to +0.3Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brennen Burns | 47.1% | -2.5range -4.0 to -1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +0.9 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dorian Finister | 44.9% | -1.9range -3.1 to -0.8Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Erik Taylor | 20.3% | -1.5range -2.4 to -0.6Sufficient evidence | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaxson Ford | 18.1% | -1.9range -3.2 to -0.7Sufficient evidence | +0.6range +0.4 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cheikh Ndiaye | 13.4% | -2.1range -3.0 to -1.4Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kian Scroggins | 12.8% | -0.6range -1.6 to +0.3Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.7Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Wade Neyland | 0.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackson Rogers | 0.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
25 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (86%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 4 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,127,419 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,127,419 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 9 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology