Rhode Island
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Thomas | 85.3% | +2.5range +1.4 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | +5.7range +5.0 to +6.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jamarques Lawrence | 71.9% | -0.8range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.5 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaden House | 68.5% | -1.0range -2.4 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| David Green | 63.6% | +1.4range +0.4 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +3.8range +3.3 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Javonte Brown | 52.1% | +1.7range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| David Fuchs | 46.6% | +0.2range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cam Estevez | 37.2% | -1.1range -2.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Drissa Traore | 29.7% | +0.4range -1.0 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyonne Farrell | 25.8% | +1.6range +0.5 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Quentin Diboundje | 19.1% | +1.4range +0.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaymien Aponte | 0.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
30 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
No exclusions were recorded.
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $7,857,206 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $7,857,206 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 28 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology