Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Radford

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Radford, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jarvis Moss72.9%+2.6range +1.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidence+4.7range +4.0 to +5.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brandon Maclin66.5%+0.4range -1.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.6 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Josiah Harris57.8%+1.3range +0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Truth Harris57.2%-2.3range -3.6 to -1.0Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaiah Gaines51.5%+0.8range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ibu Yamazaki51.2%+0.5range -0.5 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+2.6range +2.3 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Early38.4%+0.6range -0.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
TJ NeSmith33.3%-0.5range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Zion Walker22.3%-0.9range -2.0 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chace Davis16.5%+0.2range -0.6 to +1.2Limited evidence+0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tony Felder13.6%-1.9range -2.8 to -1.2Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jonas Sirtautas12.5%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.2Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Xavier Foster5.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Brennan Chatman0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

27 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (87%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,225,866Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,225,866Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days2
3 or more days26

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology