Pittsburgh
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaland Lowe | 88.4% | +1.6range +0.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.4 to +5.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ishmael Leggett | 87.7% | +4.2range +3.0 to +5.4Sufficient evidence | +6.6range +5.7 to +7.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zack Austin | 78.5% | +1.3range +0.6 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cameron Corhen | 70.7% | -0.3range -1.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +3.1range +2.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Guillermo Diaz Graham | 59.1% | +4.1range +2.2 to +5.9Sufficient evidence | +4.4range +3.6 to +5.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brandin Cummings | 35.1% | +1.1range -0.4 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Damian Dunn | 32.8% | +3.1range +1.3 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Amsal Delalić | 18.4% | +0.1range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jorge Diaz Graham | 16.3% | +1.9range +1.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Papa Amadou Kante | 10.3% | -0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Amdy Ndiaye | 1.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Marlon Barnes, Jr. | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Vason Stevenson | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
28 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 4 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $13,874,103 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $11,437,769 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 2 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 3 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology