Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Ohio St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Ohio St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Bruce Thornton89.1%+5.0range +3.8 to +6.2Sufficient evidence+7.0range +6.3 to +7.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Micah Parrish76.2%+1.9range +0.5 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.8 to +5.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Devin Royal68.8%+1.7range +0.5 to +3.0Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.5 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
John Mobley Jr.68.3%+2.1range +0.3 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.4 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Evan Mahaffey43.3%+1.0range -0.3 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.9 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sean Stewart43.3%+1.8range +0.7 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ques Glover29.4%-0.3range -1.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aaron Bradshaw27.9%+1.7range +0.3 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Meechie Johnson21.5%-0.2range -1.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colin White10.6%-0.9range -1.6 to -0.2Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Austin Parks10.1%-0.2range -0.9 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ivan Njegovan8.5%+0.7range +0.2 to +1.2Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Colby Baumann1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Kalen Etzler1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Braylen Nash0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

31 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 1 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$23,355,035Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$13,158,683Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
3 or more days31

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology