Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Nicholls St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Nicholls St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Rob Brown III73.5%+1.1range -0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+4.0range +3.3 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jamal West Jr.64.4%+0.2range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.5 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Byron Ireland58.6%-0.7range -2.0 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.5range +1.9 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Trae English55.6%-0.4range -1.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael Gray Jr.51.0%+0.1range -0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sincere Malone48.3%-0.4range -1.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.7 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaylen Searles44.7%+0.5range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mekhi Collins41.6%+0.9range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emarion Ellis31.1%-0.8range -1.5 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ike Cornish12.5%-1.2range -1.6 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Robinson11.5%+1.0range +0.5 to +1.5Limited evidence+0.6range +0.6 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brian Myles5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Quinn Strander2.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (77%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 7 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$1,226,806Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,186,820Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days10
3 or more days17

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games6

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology