New Orleans
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MJ Thomas | 69.9% | -1.7range -2.8 to -0.2Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| JR Jacobs | 63.5% | -3.1range -3.9 to -2.2Sufficient evidence | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jah Short | 61.9% | -3.5range -4.5 to -2.1Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| James White | 59.4% | -2.3range -3.7 to -0.8Sufficient evidence | +1.1range +0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kohen Rowbatham | 41.0% | -1.7range -2.6 to -0.6Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dae Dae Hunter | 40.6% | -2.0range -3.0 to -0.6Sufficient evidence | +0.8range +0.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Luke Davis | 39.2% | -2.3range -3.4 to -0.9Sufficient evidence | +0.7range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Theo Grant | 37.2% | -2.9range -4.2 to -1.4Sufficient evidence | +0.6range +0.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jamond Vincent | 35.0% | -1.5range -2.5 to -0.4Sufficient evidence | +0.8range +0.6 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Leland Coleman | 30.8% | -1.8range -2.6 to -0.6Sufficient evidence | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Grant Kemp | 18.7% | -1.0range -1.9 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kerwin Prince | 1.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackson Sowards | 0.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
23 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (74%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 8 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,310,844 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,310,844 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 11 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 9 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology