Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

New Hampshire

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for New Hampshire, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Sami Pissis73.1%-0.1range -0.8 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.9 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Davide Poser71.7%-0.2range -1.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anthony McComb III68.7%-2.4range -3.5 to -1.0Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Khalil Badru56.4%-0.4range -1.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.4 to +1.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emmanuel Okpomo52.7%+1.1range -0.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jawarie Hamelin48.7%-2.3range -3.0 to -1.5Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dylan Saunders31.5%-3.3range -4.6 to -2.1Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.3 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Middleton23.9%-0.7range -1.3 to +0.1Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Antoni Siewruk18.8%-0.3range -1.4 to +0.7Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rex Sunderland16.6%-1.6range -2.5 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Trey Woodyard15.0%-0.8range -1.7 to +0.2Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jon O'Neill14.4%-0.6range -1.4 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Giancarlo Bastianoni8.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

17 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (57%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 13 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,260,633Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,260,633Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days8
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology