NE Omaha
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquel Sutton | 84.7% | -1.4range -2.5 to +0.0Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +2.8 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tony Osburn | 66.7% | +2.4range +1.5 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | +4.7range +4.1 to +5.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| JJ White | 65.9% | +1.0range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | +3.9range +3.4 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kamryn Thomas | 62.0% | -0.2range -1.3 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.5 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Lance Waddles | 54.6% | -0.3range -1.0 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | +2.7range +2.4 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ja'Sean Glover | 52.0% | -0.2range -1.0 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.3 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Joshua Streit | 46.5% | -1.2range -2.4 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.5 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Isaac Ondekane | 43.4% | +0.4range -0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Grant Stubblefield | 11.1% | -4.7range -5.3 to -4.1Limited evidence | +0.2range +0.1 to +0.3Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Khamani Cooper | 8.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Pablo Soumare | 3.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Sebastian Perry | 0.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Lincoln Palbicki | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
20 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (61%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 13 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,458,331 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $3,573,740 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 3 |
| 2 days | 8 |
| 3 or more days | 21 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 4 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology