Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

NC Central

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for NC Central, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Po'Boigh King79.4%-0.2range -1.0 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+3.1range +2.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Perry Smith Jr.74.7%-2.2range -3.2 to -1.0Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.7 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keishon Porter62.7%-0.6range -1.6 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+2.4range +1.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Timmy Adedire61.1%-1.2range -2.1 to -0.3Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dionte Johnson48.0%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.7 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Isaac Parson45.6%-1.3range -2.8 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaqai Murray38.7%-0.3range -1.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Floyd Rideau Jr.35.0%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aquan Smart26.2%-1.0range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kelechi Okworogwo15.8%-2.4range -3.6 to -1.4Limited evidence+0.5range +0.3 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Anthony Peoples Jr.6.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Josh Smith6.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Chris Daniels0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Ellison0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

26 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$1,504,543Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$1,504,543Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days5
3 or more days20

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology