N Dakota St
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masen Miller | 82.9% | +0.7range -0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.6 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jacari White | 77.1% | +1.7range +0.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +4.4range +3.6 to +5.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jacksen Moni | 72.3% | +3.2range +1.9 to +4.5Sufficient evidence | +4.9range +4.2 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brennan Watkins | 66.9% | +0.9range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +2.9 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Noah Feddersen | 61.4% | -1.1range -2.2 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +1.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tajavis Miller | 51.7% | +0.4range -0.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Luke Kasubke | 30.2% | -0.3range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Andy Stefonowicz | 24.2% | +1.0range +0.1 to +1.9Limited evidence | +1.2range +1.1 to +1.4Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Darik Dissette | 19.5% | -1.9range -3.1 to -1.1Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jeremiah Burke | 8.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Treyson Anderson | 4.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Patrick Bath | 0.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
16 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (55%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 13 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,971,005 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,971,005 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 2 days | 6 |
| 3 or more days | 20 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 4 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology