Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Montana St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Montana St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jabe Mullins66.9%+2.0range +0.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+4.3range +3.7 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Max Agbonkpolo64.3%-0.1range -1.5 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tyler Patterson59.2%+1.3range -0.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+3.6range +3.0 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Patrick McMahon58.0%-0.2range -1.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brandon Walker48.2%+0.9range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jed Miller43.4%+4.4range +3.1 to +5.8Sufficient evidence+3.6range +3.1 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sam Lecholat42.6%+0.4range -0.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+2.3range +1.9 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryce Zephir40.6%-3.2range -5.0 to -1.7Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.6 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brian Goracke38.7%-0.5range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.4 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chika Nduka19.9%+0.9range -0.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+1.1range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
BJ Kolly14.5%-0.1range -1.0 to +0.7Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.9Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jeremiah Davis3.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Calum Rutherfurd0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$2,385,737Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,778,265Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days12
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent3
Longest run of consecutive away games5

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology