Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Monmouth NJ

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Monmouth NJ, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jack Collins89.1%-0.2range -1.3 to +1.0Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.5 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Abdi Bashir Jr.82.1%-2.1range -3.2 to -0.8Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.2 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Madison Durr80.0%+1.2range -0.1 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.8 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cornelius Robinson Jr.57.3%-0.3range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaret Valencia47.9%-1.1range -2.2 to +0.2Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.6 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dok Muordar36.7%+1.6range +0.5 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+2.3range +2.0 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andrew Ball25.9%+0.8range -0.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chris Morgan20.6%+0.4range -1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Justin Ray19.9%-0.5range -1.6 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Aric Demings18.3%-2.6range -3.5 to -1.8Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Meka14.7%-1.2range -1.9 to -0.5Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lucas Orchard1.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Corey Miller1.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Sam Fagan1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Quinn Peters1.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jack Leahy1.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Christopher Green0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

30 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (91%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$3,796,957Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$3,796,957Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days8
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.6
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology