Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Mississippi St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Mississippi St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Josh Hubbard86.6%+2.7range +1.5 to +3.8Sufficient evidence+5.9range +5.2 to +6.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cameron Matthews78.8%+4.7range +3.4 to +5.9Sufficient evidence+6.4range +5.7 to +7.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
KeShawn Murphy59.0%+0.6range -0.5 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
RJ Melendez56.7%+0.8range -0.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.2range +2.7 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Riley Kugel56.3%+2.1range +0.9 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.1 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Claudell Harris Jr.54.9%+0.6range -0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Shawn Jones Jr.48.2%-0.5range -2.1 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.6 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael Nwoko39.6%+1.4range +0.4 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kanye Clary9.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Dellquan Warren8.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Gai Chol1.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jeremy Foumena0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Harrison Alexander0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

21 of 34 games passed lineup acceptance (62%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 13 of 34 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$12,220,601Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$12,220,601Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
3 or more days31

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology