Miami OH
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Suder | 78.7% | +1.6range +0.5 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | +4.7range +4.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Eian Elmer | 68.5% | +0.9range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kam Craft | 66.0% | +0.4range -0.7 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | +3.4range +2.8 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Mekhi Cooper | 60.2% | -1.2range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +1.9 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Antwone Woolfolk | 56.9% | +2.0range +0.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Evan Ipsaro | 48.8% | +1.4range +0.4 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.5 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brant Byers | 43.7% | +0.3range -0.9 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Reece Potter | 36.5% | -0.1range -1.2 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.7range +1.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Luke Skaljac | 31.4% | +0.3range -1.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackson Kotecki | 5.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dan Luers | 3.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Eli Yofan | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Blake Anderson | 0.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jack Sauer | 0.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,901,957 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,901,957 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched through an NCES IPEDS institution alias, with state and home-venue city agreeing.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 3 |
| 3 or more days | 28 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology