Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Maryland

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Maryland, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Ja'Kobi Gillespie79.1%+5.6range +4.3 to +6.8Sufficient evidence+6.7range +5.8 to +7.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rodney Rice78.2%+4.3range +2.7 to +5.8Sufficient evidence+5.9range +5.0 to +6.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Derik Queen75.3%+5.1range +3.7 to +6.2Sufficient evidence+6.0range +5.2 to +6.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Selton Miguel72.1%+2.4range +1.0 to +3.7Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.7 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Julian Reese72.1%+5.7range +4.4 to +6.9Sufficient evidence+6.1range +5.4 to +6.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
DeShawn Harris-Smith37.4%+0.7range -1.0 to +2.5Sufficient evidence+1.7range +1.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jayhlon Young24.1%+1.7range +0.4 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tafara Gapare22.3%+1.3range -0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Geronimo19.5%+1.0range -0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Malachi Palmer12.6%+1.5range -0.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chance Stephens2.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Braden Pierce2.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Ben Murphy1.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Lukas Sotell0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

34 of 36 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 36 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$16,464,647Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$12,972,857Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days33

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology