Marquette
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kam Jones | 86.7% | +5.3range +4.2 to +6.3Sufficient evidence | +7.5range +6.9 to +8.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| David Joplin | 80.6% | +2.2range +1.0 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +5.3range +4.5 to +6.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Chase Ross | 77.9% | +2.1range +1.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.3 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Stevie Mitchell | 70.2% | +3.2range +1.8 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | +5.1range +4.4 to +6.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ben Gold | 65.1% | +2.4range +1.0 to +3.6Sufficient evidence | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zaide Lowery | 35.7% | -0.3range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.7range +1.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Royce Parham | 33.8% | +0.3range -1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.7range +1.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tre Norman | 19.7% | +0.6range -0.7 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Damarius Owens | 17.3% | -2.7range -3.7 to -1.8Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.7Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Caedin Hamilton | 11.6% | -2.1range -2.8 to -1.5Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jack Anderson | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Cameron Brown | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jonah Lucas | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jake Ciardo | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Casey O'Malley | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
25 of 34 games passed lineup acceptance (74%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 9 of 34 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $25,734,325 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $20,053,484 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 32 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology