Marist
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Pascarelli | 84.4% | +1.0range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | +5.0range +4.3 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jadin Collins-Roberts | 81.7% | +0.5range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | +4.5range +3.9 to +5.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Elijah Lewis | 75.8% | +1.5range +0.6 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | +4.7range +4.1 to +5.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaden Daughtry | 63.1% | +1.0range +0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackson Price | 40.6% | +1.6range +0.8 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +2.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jason Schofield | 28.3% | +0.9range +0.4 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tarik Watson | 25.2% | -0.0range -1.1 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Travis Roberts | 22.9% | -1.2range -2.1 to -0.1Sufficient evidence | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Trace Salton | 21.8% | -1.0range -2.2 to -0.2Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Martin Kawa | 20.3% | -1.2range -2.2 to -0.1Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Caleb Mackrey | 16.5% | -1.6range -2.3 to -0.9Limited evidence | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Parby Kabamba | 15.0% | -1.1range -1.8 to -0.1Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Matt McCool | 3.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Antoni Vlogianitis | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jagger Bascombe | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (90%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 3 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,629,385 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,629,385 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 9 |
| 3 or more days | 20 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology