Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Manhattan

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Manhattan, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jaden Winston81.5%-0.4range -1.7 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.0 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Shaquil Bender77.9%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+3.4range +2.8 to +4.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Wesley Robinson75.9%+1.2range +0.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Devin Dinkins75.0%+1.6range +0.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.7 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Masiah Gilyard74.5%+0.4range -0.8 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.9range +3.2 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Will Sydnor71.7%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+3.3range +2.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Fraser Roxburgh28.7%+2.2range +1.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidence+1.8range +1.6 to +2.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Alijah Curry7.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Marko Ljubicic4.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
John Berbano0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Michael Lawlor0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Daniel Hackett0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Amaan Sandhu0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Aryan Arora0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Allen Myers0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jackson Delaney0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

23 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (79%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 6 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$2,453,965Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,412,158Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days10
3 or more days18

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.3
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent4
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology