Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Loyola-Chicago

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Loyola-Chicago, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Des Watson86.5%+0.4range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.7 to +5.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Sheldon Edwards Jr.69.0%+3.3range +1.9 to +4.6Sufficient evidence+5.0range +4.3 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jayden Dawson66.1%+1.8range +0.4 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+4.1range +3.4 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Miles Rubin59.3%+1.1range +0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+3.4range +2.9 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Francis Nwaokorie53.1%+0.2range -1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+2.7range +2.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jalen Quinn49.3%-0.8range -1.9 to +0.1Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kymany Houinsou48.1%+1.9range +0.8 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jalen DeLoach33.9%+2.3range +0.9 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Justin Moore16.8%+2.2range +1.4 to +3.0Sufficient evidence+1.1range +1.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daniil Glazkov10.4%+0.6range -0.2 to +1.4Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Seifeldin Hendawy2.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jack Turner2.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Caleb Reese1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Zachary Royster0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Matthew Mortenson0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Samuel Yurasek0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$7,021,288Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$7,021,288Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days1
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology