Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Loyola MD

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Loyola MD, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Jacob Theodosiou81.8%-0.2range -1.2 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.3 to +4.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Braeden Speed80.7%-0.4range -1.4 to +0.5Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.1 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jordan Stiemke74.3%+0.1range -1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence+3.7range +3.1 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Milos Ilic71.1%+1.9range +0.9 to +3.1Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.8 to +5.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tyson Commander68.9%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+3.5range +3.0 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
David Brown III50.4%-1.4range -2.1 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.7 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Veljko Ilic42.7%+0.8range -0.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.1 to +2.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chris Kuzemka10.6%-0.2range -0.6 to +0.2Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Samuel Gibbs8.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Troy Cicero Jr.5.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Garrett Brennan3.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Goap Kodi1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Peter Sposito0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Greg Guidinger0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

21 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (70%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 9 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$2,130,645Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,130,645Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
2 days2
3 or more days27

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology