Lipscomb
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Ognacevic | 85.1% | +2.8range +1.9 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | +5.2range +4.5 to +6.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Will Pruitt | 81.4% | +2.6range +1.3 to +4.0Sufficient evidence | +4.8range +4.1 to +5.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Joe Anderson | 81.4% | +2.1range +1.1 to +3.6Sufficient evidence | +4.6range +3.8 to +5.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Gyasi Powell | 79.5% | +2.4range +1.1 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | +4.6range +3.8 to +5.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Charlie Williams | 40.8% | +1.6range +0.4 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Miles White | 32.2% | -0.1range -1.1 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Grant Asman | 29.8% | +1.2range -0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Dylan Faulkner | 20.1% | +3.7range +1.9 to +4.8Sufficient evidence | +1.2range +1.0 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Logan Suber | 17.3% | +1.4range +0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +0.8range +0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kellan Boylan | 15.8% | +0.0range -0.9 to +0.8Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.6 to +0.7Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Rylan Houck | 7.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ross Candelino | 6.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jack Ingold | 1.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zach Lamey | 0.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Luke Carter | 0.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
26 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (79%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 7 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,770,794 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,770,794 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 11 |
| 3 or more days | 21 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 3 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology