Lehigh
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam Gillus | 75.5% | -2.2range -3.3 to -0.8Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +1.8 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyler Whitney-Sidney | 75.2% | -1.2range -2.6 to +0.2Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.0 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Joshua Ingram | 65.9% | -0.3range -1.6 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Hank Alvey | 63.9% | -0.0range -1.1 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Nasir Whitlock | 59.1% | +0.6range -1.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | +2.9range +2.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ben Knostman | 46.5% | +3.1range +1.9 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Edouard Benoit | 43.0% | -1.5range -2.8 to -0.1Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Keith Higgins Jr. | 27.8% | +0.1range -1.4 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Alfredo Addesa | 17.8% | -0.1range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tommy Conniff | 17.3% | -0.1range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | +0.8range +0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Bube Momah | 4.6% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Peter Kramer | 1.4% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jake Pike | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brendan Reed | 1.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 28 games passed lineup acceptance (96%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 1 of 28 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,252,333 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,252,333 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 3 |
| 3 or more days | 24 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 5 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology