Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

La Salle

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for La Salle, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Corey McKeithan88.5%+0.6range -0.3 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.5 to +4.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Daeshon Shepherd74.9%-1.8range -2.9 to -0.6Sufficient evidence+2.5range +1.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Deuce Jones II73.1%-0.6range -1.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jahlil White61.2%+0.7range -0.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.5 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi51.2%+0.6range -0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.1 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mac Etienne48.6%+0.5range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+2.4range +1.9 to +2.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Demetrius Lilley38.8%+1.0range -0.1 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+2.0range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andres Marrero29.0%+1.2range -0.0 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Eric Acker19.9%-3.2range -4.1 to -2.2Sufficient evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ryan Zan13.9%-0.2range -0.8 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jay Joseph0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Charles Ireland0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Milos Kovacevic0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jason Umosella0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (91%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 3 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$3,832,568Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$3,832,568Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology