Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Kennesaw

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Kennesaw, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Adrian Wooley86.7%+2.8range +1.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+5.9range +5.3 to +6.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Simeon Cottle81.3%+0.2range -1.0 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.4 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Braedan Lue66.0%+1.0range -0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.3 to +4.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Rongie Gordon61.6%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.6Sufficient evidence+3.8range +3.2 to +4.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jamil Miller57.9%-0.1range -1.4 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Frankquon Sherman40.2%+1.7range -0.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ricardo Wright37.2%-1.8range -3.0 to -0.9Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.0 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Delaney Heard34.4%-1.5range -2.8 to -0.2Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.1 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Andre Weir24.5%+0.6range -0.1 to +1.2Sufficient evidence+1.4range +1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ramone Seals9.2%-0.3range -0.9 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Mekhi Turner0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Eric Holland0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Charles Stone0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Dozie Onyirimba0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (93%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$3,039,976Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$3,039,976Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days7
3 or more days19

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology