Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

James Madison

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for James Madison, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Mark Freeman73.7%-0.2range -1.3 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+3.6range +2.9 to +4.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Xavier Brown73.6%+2.1range +1.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidence+4.7range +4.1 to +5.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Bryce Lindsay70.4%+2.3range +1.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence+4.6range +3.9 to +5.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Eddie Ricks III64.3%-0.5range -1.8 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.3 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Elijah Hutchins-Everett63.8%+3.2range +1.9 to +4.3Sufficient evidence+4.6range +4.0 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
AJ Smith60.8%-0.4range -1.9 to +1.1Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.2 to +3.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ebenezer Dowuona27.4%-1.5range -2.7 to -0.1Sufficient evidence+1.1range +0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Noah Williams26.1%-0.2range -1.3 to +0.9Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.0 to +1.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Justin Taylor19.7%-0.8range -1.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+0.9range +0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Luke Anderson10.7%+0.0range -0.7 to +0.8Limited evidence+0.5range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Will Lovings-Watts7.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Redd Thompson Jr.1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jarrell Pope0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Aidan Mckeon0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Shane Feden0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Matt Hain0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

24 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (80%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 6 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue$4,408,806Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$4,408,806Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day2
2 days6
3 or more days21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent2
Longest run of consecutive away games3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology