Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

PFW

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for PFW, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Rasheed Bello83.5%+1.5range +0.3 to +2.7Sufficient evidence+4.9range +4.1 to +5.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Quinton Morton-Robertson78.7%+1.1range -0.0 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+4.3range +3.7 to +5.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jalen Jackson76.1%+1.0range -0.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.5 to +4.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Maximus Nelson57.9%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence+2.5range +2.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Corey Hadnot II55.5%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.3Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chandler Cuthrell47.0%+2.1range +1.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.6 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Eric Mulder44.8%+1.1range +0.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence+2.4range +2.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Trey Lewis23.2%-0.4range -1.6 to +0.6Sufficient evidence+1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Deangelo Elisee21.7%+3.0range +1.7 to +3.9Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.3 to +1.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Chris Morgan10.6%-0.7range -1.5 to -0.1Limited evidence+0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Johnathan DeJurnett0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Keaton Dukes0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

24 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (80%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 6 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$3,420,827Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$2,646,771Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days27

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent0
Longest run of consecutive away games4

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology