Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Iowa St

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Iowa St, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Tamin Lipsey74.7%+4.4range +2.6 to +6.0Sufficient evidence+5.7range +4.9 to +6.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Joshua Jefferson74.3%+4.5range +3.2 to +5.8Sufficient evidence+5.7range +5.0 to +6.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Curtis Jones72.6%+3.4range +2.2 to +4.7Sufficient evidence+5.0range +4.3 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Keshon Gilbert64.4%+4.8range +3.2 to +6.0Sufficient evidence+5.0range +4.4 to +5.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Milan Momcilovic54.8%+5.2range +3.7 to +6.3Sufficient evidence+4.4range +3.8 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nate Heise53.3%+3.2range +1.6 to +4.4Sufficient evidence+3.5range +2.9 to +4.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dishon Jackson46.6%+2.3range +0.7 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.3 to +3.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Brandton Chatfield35.8%+1.6range +0.5 to +2.8Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.7 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Demarion Watson11.1%+0.5range -0.4 to +1.5Limited evidence+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Cade Kelderman5.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Nojus Indrusaitis4.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
JT Rock1.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Kayden Fish1.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Conrad Hawley0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

33 of 35 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 2 of 35 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$14,437,710Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$10,382,761Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days3
3 or more days28

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology