Hampton
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Farrakhan | 69.1% | -1.1range -2.3 to -0.2Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Xzavier Long | 67.7% | -0.0range -1.1 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +3.3range +2.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| George Beale Jr. | 61.9% | +1.4range +0.1 to +2.8Sufficient evidence | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kyrese Mullen | 51.9% | -0.2range -1.4 to +1.0Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Wayne Bristol, Jr. | 51.7% | -0.2range -1.4 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +2.5range +2.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Daniel Johnson | 45.7% | +0.7range -0.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Etienne Strothers | 35.8% | +0.8range -0.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Richard Goods | 31.5% | +2.2range +1.6 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.8 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Trevor Smith | 30.5% | -3.1range -4.0 to -2.2Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyler Rice | 24.4% | +0.5range -0.4 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Eunique Rink | 17.2% | -0.1range -0.9 to +0.9Limited evidence | +0.8range +0.7 to +1.0Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Daniel Banister | 7.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Elijah Kennedy | 3.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Daniel Nixon | 0.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ryan Hite | 0.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
24 of 30 games passed lineup acceptance (80%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 6 of 30 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $2,223,463 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $2,993,447 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 3 |
| 2 days | 8 |
| 3 or more days | 18 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 3 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology