Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Gonzaga

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Gonzaga, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Ryan Nembhard86.9%+6.5range +5.4 to +7.6Sufficient evidence+6.8range +6.0 to +7.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Nolan Hickman76.7%+5.3range +3.9 to +6.6Sufficient evidence+5.3range +4.5 to +6.1Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Khalif Battle65.8%+1.5range +0.0 to +3.0Sufficient evidence+2.9range +2.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Graham Ike58.6%+3.8range +2.7 to +4.8Sufficient evidence+3.3range +3.0 to +3.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ben Gregg49.6%+3.9range +3.0 to +5.0Sufficient evidence+2.8range +2.5 to +3.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Michael Ajayi44.7%+2.7range +1.5 to +3.8Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Dusty Stromer39.5%+2.5range +0.6 to +3.8Sufficient evidence+1.9range +1.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Braden Huff39.3%+3.9range +2.5 to +5.2Sufficient evidence+2.2range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emmanuel Innocenti26.7%+2.9range +1.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidence+1.3range +1.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ismaila Diagne5.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Jun Seok Yeo3.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Joe Few2.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Joaquim ArauzMoore0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Noah Haaland0.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

28 of 35 games passed lineup acceptance (80%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 7 of 35 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$19,510,548Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$13,588,661Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day3
2 days7
3 or more days24

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology