Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Georgia Tech

2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Georgia Tech, 2025: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
PlayerPossession shareNet and rangeWins above replacement and rangeSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% range
Naithan George88.2%+1.2range +0.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+4.5range +3.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Lance Terry76.5%+0.3range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence+3.5range +2.8 to +4.2Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Baye Ndongo74.8%+2.1range +0.7 to +3.6Sufficient evidence+4.2range +3.6 to +4.9Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Duncan Powell68.0%+0.1range -1.3 to +1.5Sufficient evidence+3.0range +2.4 to +3.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Jaeden Mustaf44.1%+0.7range -0.5 to +1.9Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Javian McCollum43.6%+0.8range -0.3 to +2.3Sufficient evidence+2.1range +1.8 to +2.6Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ibrahim Souare37.1%-0.5range -1.5 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+1.5range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Luke O'Brien15.4%-0.7range -1.6 to +0.4Sufficient evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Doryan Onwuchekwa13.5%+0.6range -0.1 to +1.5Limited evidence+0.7range +0.6 to +0.8Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Darrion Sutton13.4%-0.3range -0.9 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Ryan Mutombo13.0%-0.2range -0.8 to +0.5Limited evidence+0.6range +0.5 to +0.6Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Kowacie Reeves Jr.11.0%-0.9range -2.0 to +0.3Limited evidence+0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidenceNone: no budget that season—
Emmer Nichols0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—
Marcos San Miguel0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidenceNot applicableNone: no budget that season—

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

  • 4 of 33 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue$14,536,539Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses$12,013,953Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched through an NCES IPEDS institution alias, with state and home-venue city agreeing.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest daysGames
First game (no rest value)1
1 day1
2 days1
3 or more days30

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent1
Longest run of consecutive away games2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology