Georgetown
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micah Peavy | 93.0% | +2.9range +2.1 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | +5.7range +5.1 to +6.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Malik Mack | 81.2% | +0.1range -0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +3.6range +3.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jayden Epps | 65.0% | -0.0range -1.2 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Drew Fielder | 57.4% | +0.8range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Thomas Sorber | 55.2% | +5.0range +3.4 to +6.2Sufficient evidence | +4.1range +3.5 to +4.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jordan Burks | 46.6% | +0.0range -0.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Caleb Williams | 41.6% | +1.1range -0.0 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Curtis Williams Jr. | 33.8% | -0.5range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kayvaun Mulready | 10.0% | +0.5range -0.4 to +1.3Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Drew McKenna | 8.4% | -1.3range -2.0 to -0.4Limited evidence | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.4Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Julius Halaifonua | 5.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Austin Montgomery | 1.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Michael Van Raaphorst | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Hashem Asadallah | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
28 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (88%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 4 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $17,459,258 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $17,459,258 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 30 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology