George Mason
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darius Maddox | 77.4% | +2.4range +1.1 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | +4.8range +4.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brayden O'Connor | 68.5% | +1.9range +0.7 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jared Billups | 63.7% | +3.4range +2.2 to +4.4Sufficient evidence | +4.3range +3.8 to +4.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jalen Haynes | 63.1% | +3.1range +2.0 to +4.0Sufficient evidence | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Woody Newton | 55.6% | +1.5range +0.3 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | +3.1range +2.5 to +3.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zach Anderson | 51.9% | +3.6range +2.2 to +5.0Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| K.D. Johnson | 49.1% | +0.0range -1.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Giovanni Emejuru | 39.6% | +0.9range -0.2 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.7 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Justin Begg | 21.3% | -0.2range -1.4 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jeremiah Quigley | 5.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Stas Sivka | 3.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Bryson Cokley | 1.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Chase Tucker | 0.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
33 of 33 games passed lineup acceptance (100%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
No exclusions were recorded.
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $5,776,180 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $5,776,180 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 2 days | 1 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 0 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology