Gardner Webb
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darryl Simmons II | 84.6% | -1.2range -2.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence | +3.2range +2.7 to +3.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Anthony Selden | 77.1% | -2.0range -3.1 to -1.1Sufficient evidence | +2.6range +1.9 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jamaine Mann | 70.1% | -1.0range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence | +2.8range +2.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Pharell Boyogueno | 56.4% | +1.6range +0.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | +3.1range +2.7 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Isaiah Richards | 55.5% | +2.7range +1.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Shahar Lazar | 41.8% | -1.7range -2.6 to -0.7Sufficient evidence | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.8Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ademide Badmus | 41.7% | -1.9range -3.1 to -0.5Sufficient evidence | +1.4range +1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jacob Hudson | 27.8% | -0.8range -2.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brendan Mykalcio | 20.2% | -0.0range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | +1.0range +0.8 to +1.2Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Colin Hawkins | 18.4% | -3.9range -5.0 to -2.6Sufficient evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Taku Youngblood | 3.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Race Herr | 1.9% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Paul Lindberg | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| DeShawn Goodwyn | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
29 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 2 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $1,495,968 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,495,968 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 4 |
| 3 or more days | 25 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 2 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 3 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology