Fordham
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japhet Medor | 82.6% | +2.0range +0.6 to +3.4Sufficient evidence | +4.5range +3.8 to +5.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jackie Johnson III | 78.1% | -0.8range -2.1 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +3.0range +2.4 to +3.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Romad Dean | 67.1% | -1.6range -2.7 to -0.5Sufficient evidence | +2.4range +1.8 to +3.0Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Josh Rivera | 63.1% | -2.6range -3.4 to -1.5Sufficient evidence | +1.8range +1.4 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Abdou Tsimbila | 49.9% | -0.7range -2.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.7 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jahmere Tripp | 44.2% | +0.8range -0.5 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.9 to +2.7Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Zach Riley | 43.7% | -1.4range -2.9 to -0.0Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Matt Zona | 42.6% | +0.9range -0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Will Richardson | 12.2% | -0.7range -2.2 to +0.4Limited evidence | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ryan Pettis | 11.8% | -1.6range -2.4 to -0.9Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jaden Smith | 3.8% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jameson O'Toole | 0.7% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Max Miller | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Aleksander Pachucki | 0.2% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Brian Nussbaum | 0.0% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
27 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (84%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 5 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses
| Reported revenue | $8,756,051 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $8,756,051 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 2 |
| 3 or more days | 29 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 2 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology