Florida A&M
2025 · evaluation season · nil-value-v3 · Team results
Roster valuesβ
| Player | Possession share | Net and range | Wins above replacement and range | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milton Matthews | 77.9% | -1.5range -2.7 to +0.0Sufficient evidence | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Roderick Coffee III | 60.2% | -0.6range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.4Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jordan Chatman | 59.4% | -0.5range -2.0 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Sterling Young | 55.7% | -2.6range -3.8 to -0.9Sufficient evidence | +1.3range +0.9 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Ja'Derryus Eatmon | 50.7% | -0.4range -1.5 to +0.7Sufficient evidence | +1.8range +1.5 to +2.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Kaleb Washington | 42.2% | -3.8range -5.0 to -2.6Sufficient evidence | +0.7range +0.4 to +1.1Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Shaqir O'Neal | 42.1% | -2.8range -3.8 to -1.3Sufficient evidence | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.3Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jamine Charles | 39.4% | +0.5range -0.6 to +2.0Sufficient evidence | +1.6range +1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Jocobi Hendricks | 17.4% | -0.9range -1.9 to +0.1Limited evidence | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Trey Lewis | 17.4% | -2.7range -3.6 to -1.8Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Saiyd Burnside | 14.5% | -1.5range -2.3 to -0.4Limited evidence | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Tyler Shirley | 10.7% | -2.3range -3.7 to -1.2Limited evidence | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.4Limited evidence | None: no budget that season | — |
| Miles Hall | 7.1% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
| Lenard Taylor Jr. | 5.5% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — |
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
Coverage and exclusions
22 of 29 games passed lineup acceptance (76%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.
- 7 of 29 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team
Program revenueβ
EADA year 2024-25 (primary pairing to repo season 2025; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses
| Reported revenue | $500,000 | Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output. |
|---|---|---|
| Reported expenses | $1,189,864 | Reported by the school. |
EADA link: matched through an NCES IPEDS institution alias, with state and home-venue city agreeing.
No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.
Schedule loadβ
Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.
Rest days before each game
| Rest days | Games |
|---|---|
| First game (no rest value) | 1 |
| 1 day | 1 |
| 2 days | 8 |
| 3 or more days | 19 |
Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.
Load summary
| Mean games in prior 7 days | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Games with fewer rest days than the opponent | 1 |
| Longest run of consecutive away games | 5 |
Association between rest and margin, all teams
Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41
This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.
Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology